OSHA Inspection: LKK WASH

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that employees required to access the elevated walkway, about 6 feet in height, were provided with standard railings and toeboards.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to create and certify a workplace hazard assessment.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:   On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that the flexible cords, near the control boxes, were not used as permanent wiring, and were not spliced.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords were being used as a permanent source for wiring:  On or about 3/8/2016, the employer failed to ensure that the service technician did not use flexible cords as permanent wiring. Flexible extension cords were used in the place of permanent wiring in the control panels.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that flexible cords were used in continuous lengths without splices. The control panel was wired with flexible cords that were spliced.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7): Electric equipment was not installed in a neat and workmanlike manner:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer did not ensure that the electrical systems were installed in a workmanlike manner. The wiring and electrical equipment, near the control panels, were not easily identifiable and was installed in an untidy manner.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that equipment operating at 50 volts or more, were guarded against accidental contact. The 408V service feeder, near the control panels, had the power cables protruding out of the junction box.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that the knockouts of the junction boxes were effectively closed including, but not limited to the 408v service feeder.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to ensure that all junction boxes, including but not limited to the 408V service feeder, were provided with faceplates.

Issued

Apr 18, 2016

Abate by

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:  On or about 3/8/16, the employer failed to implement safety-related work practices when employees are expected to work on electrical equipment, including but not limited to the control panels, without de-energizing the system.