Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PLENUMS OF FLORIDA INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PLENUMS OF FLORIDA INC in 6501 49TH STREET NORTH, PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 341312635.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Plenums of Florida INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Plenums of Florida INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6501 49TH STREET NORTH
City
PINELLAS PARK
State
FL
ZIP
33781
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1890, PINELLAS PARK, FL 33780
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  (a) Shop - An employee MIG welding was not wearing sleeves or other arm protection against UV light and sparks, on or about March 17, 2016.  (b) Shop - An employee MIG welding was not wearing a welding coat or other body protection against UV light and sparks, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a) Shop - an assessment of required welding PPE was not conducted, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:  (a) Shop - An employee MIG welding was not wearing gloves or other hand protection against UV light and sparks, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):   a) Shop - Accupress 100-ton hydraulic press brake, model 710012 and serial number 2484, point of operation was not guarded, on or about March 17, 2016.  b) Shop - Accushear shear, model 625010 and serial number 4349, had inadequate point of operation guarding due to a 0.75 inch gap between the shear bed and the first bar of the guard, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.252 B02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(A): Helmets or hand shields were not used during all arc welding or arc cutting operations:   (a) Shop - An employee MIG welding was not wearing a helmet or other face protection against UV radiation, on or about March 17, 2016.  (b) Shop - An attendant who was watching the MIG welding was not wearing a helmet or other face protection against UV radiation, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) Facility-wide - No program was developed and respirator usage was required for the painter and the adhesive applier, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) Facility-wide - No medical evaluations were performed, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a) Facility-wide - No fit tests were performed, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01 VII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134:    a) Facility-wide - No respirator training was provided, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.252 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(6)(ii): Indoors, welding or cutting involving zinc-bearing base or filler metals coated with zinc-bearing materials was not done in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.252(c)(3):   (a) Shop - MIG welding on galvanized metal was not provided with mechanical local exhaust ventilation, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2016
Abate by
Jun 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Welding and Plasma Cutting Areas - Employees were not informed of the hazards of chemicals they were exposed to, including but not limited to, zinc oxide fume, iron oxide fume and manganese fume, on or about March 17, 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Plenums of Florida INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341312635.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.