LEAWOOD, KS —
OSHA Inspection: K.C. COLORS AUTO BODY INC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of K.C. COLORS AUTO BODY INC in 2007 W 103RD TERRACE, LEAWOOD, KS 66206 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 341314979.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- K.C. COLORS AUTO BODY INC
- Site address
- 2007 W 103RD TERRACE
- City
- LEAWOOD
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66206
- Mailing
- 2007 W 103RD TERRACE, LEAWOOD, KS 66206
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): Hazard assessment and equipment selection. The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Employees engaged in auto body repair and refinish activities were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer did not conduct a hazard assessment to determine if hazards are present that necessitate the use of PPE.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that appropriate eye protection was used when employees were subjected to eye injuries from flying objects, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation: Employees engaged in spray painting activities were exposed to liquid chemical hazards in that the employer did not ensure appropriate eye protection was used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Employees engaged in auto body repair and spray painting activities were exposed to respiratory hazards in that the employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory program for required respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Employees engaged in auto body repair and refinishing activities were exposed to respiratory hazards in that the employer did not provide a medical evaluation before fit testing or required use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph: Employees engaged in auto body repair and refinishing activities were exposed to respiratory hazards in that the employer did not conduct a qualitative or quantitative fit test for tightfitting respirator users.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
13771539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Employees engaged in auto body repair and refinishing were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program as described by the standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at K.C. Colors Auto Body INC
View K.C. Colors Auto Body INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341314979.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.