CARROLLTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: SEACROSS TRADING CO, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SEACROSS TRADING CO, INC. in 1745 HAYDEN DRIVE SUITE 140, CARROLLTON, TX 75006 (NAICS 337121). OSHA activity number 341318038.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEACROSS TRADING CO, INC.
- Site address
- 1745 HAYDEN DRIVE SUITE 140
- City
- CARROLLTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75006
- Mailing
- 1745 HAYDEN DRIVE SUITE 140, CARROLLTON, TX 75006
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337121
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that employees wearing prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses: a) Employer did not ensure employees wore the appropriate eye protection while nailing in assembly area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $2138
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift: a) Employer did not ensure that each employee was trained and certified before operating a forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $2138
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,276 · Current $3,350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) Employer did not ensure one or more method of machine guarding was provided on two (2) table saws in the manufacturing area; b) Employer did not ensure one or more method of machine guarding was provided on a hand saw in the manufacturing area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3350
- · Z (S) $4276
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Employer did not ensure electrical outlets and electrical junction boxes were free of recognized hazards in the warehouse and table saw area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $2138
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $1,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: a) Employer did not ensure service feeder behind table saw, was legibly marked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1450
- · Z (S) $3563
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) Employer did not ensure electrical cabinet behind table saw did not have unused openings.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $2138
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: a) Employer did not ensure junction box in manufacturing work bay was provided with its cover.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337121)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341318038.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.