WATERSOUND, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: TENO'S FRAMING COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TENO'S FRAMING COMPANY, INC. in YACHT POND LANE LOT# 35, WATERSOUND, FL 32461 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341322212.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TENO'S FRAMING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- YACHT POND LANE LOT# 35
- City
- WATERSOUND
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32461
- Mailing
- 101 EAST PICASO CIRCLE, DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, FL 32434
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards: a. On or about March 14, 2016 on the north side of a new construction residential frame, an employee operating a Skytrack 6036 powered industrial truck (serial number 6160024390) did not use a seat belt exposing the employee to crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift: a. On or about March 14, 2016 on a jobsite of a new residential home, the employer did not ensure that an employee was certified to operate a Skytrack 6036, 6000 lbs. forklift, exposing employees to struck-by and crushing hazards, and decapitation. In the alternative: 1926.602(d) Powered industrial truck operator training. Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at sub-section 1910.178(l) of this chapter.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2100
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest system: a. On or about March 14, 2016 at a new residential home jobsite, employees working on the north side of a framed structure was not protected from a more than 25 feet fall hazard by the use of a personal fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4400
- · Z (S) $4900
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341322212.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.