Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: CONCESSION SERVICES INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CONCESSION SERVICES INC. in 4100 S. ASHLAND, CHICAGO, IL 60609 (NAICS 453998). OSHA activity number 341322238.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Concession Services INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Concession Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4100 S. ASHLAND
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60609
Mailing
4100 S. ASHLAND, CHICAGO, IL 60609
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
453998
Employees
18
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the employees were exposed to crushing hazards.          a) On or about February 27, 2016, at a jobsite located at 4100 S. Ashland Ave. Chicago, IL, the employer did not ensure that employees who were operating a John Deere Gator Truck to maintain the grounds of the facility were protected from tip over of the truck. There were three employees riding in a the two passenger truck, of which, one employee was riding on the hitch of the truck while the truck was in motion, which exposed them to crushing hazards caused by tip over of the truck. The employer did not ensure that employees were trained on the operation of the truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3150
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Sep 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).    a) On or about March 10, 2016, employees were operating a forklift truck without being provided with powered industrial training prior to operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2250
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    a) On or about March 10, 2016, employees were handling hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to ZacaGrasa and DuMore, and the company did not develop and implement a hazard communication program before handling of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2700

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.    a) On or about February 27, 2016, the employer failed to report to OSHA the hospitalization of one or more employees as a result of a work-related accident.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2500
  • · Z (O) $5000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341322238.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.