Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FINCHER AND SONS PIPE AND STEEL

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FINCHER AND SONS PIPE AND STEEL in 1331 S. CHISOLM RD, CADDO, OK 74729 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 341323657.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fincher and Sons Pipe and Steel for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fincher and Sons Pipe and Steel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1331 S. CHISOLM RD
City
CADDO
State
OK
ZIP
74729
Mailing
1331 S. CHISOLM RD, CADDO, OK 74729
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(2): 29 CFR 1910.107(d)(2):  Spraying area(s) were not provided with mechanical ventilation adequate to remove flammable vapors, mists or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues:    On or about March 15, 2016, the employer did not provide ventilation in the spraying area exposing employees to hazards associated with fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  On or about March 15, 2016, the employer did not ensure the spraying area was kept free of the accumulation of residue exposing employees to hazards associated with fire.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    The employer did not ensure point of operation guarding was in place to protect employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone during operation.         a)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the iron worker points of operation were not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      b)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the shear point of operation was not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      c)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the set of rollers located outside on the south side of the building was missing the emergency trip wire exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      d)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the chop saw located outside on the south side of the shop was not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      e)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the drill press point of operation was not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      f)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the chop saw located in the middle of the shop was not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.      g)   This violation was observed on or about March 15, 2016, the Cincinnati press brake located in the shop was not guarded exposing employees to hazards associated with being caught in the machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.243 C01 II A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Jun 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1)(ii)(a): Safety guard(s) on portable abrasive wheel(s) were not mounted so as to maintain proper alignment with the wheel:  On or about March 15, 2016, the employer allowed employees to use a portable grinder without the safety guard in place exposing employees to hazards associated with being struck by the grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):    On or about March 15, 2016, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program exposing employees to hazards associated with contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:  On or about March 15, 2016, the employer did not ensure compressed gas cylinders were stored in accordance with the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 exposing employees to the hazard of struck-by falling or displaced cylinders.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about March 15, 2016, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program exposing employees to hazards associated with respiratory distress and contacting hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341323657.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.