SAINT CHARLES, MO —
OSHA Inspection: RX SYSTEMS, INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RX SYSTEMS, INC in 121 POINT WEST BLVD., SAINT CHARLES, MO 63301 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 341324267.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RX SYSTEMS, INC
- Site address
- 121 POINT WEST BLVD.
- City
- SAINT CHARLES
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63301
- Mailing
- 121 POINT WEST BLVD., SAINT CHARLES, MO 63301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 235
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls from portable ladders: At the facility, the employer did not ensure that fiberglass portable step ladders in the workplace and available for employee use were utilized in a safe manner. On or about April 20, 2016, an employee was observed over reaching while facing away from the Werner 10-foot step ladder, labeled BP #2, to clean glue off of the rollers of the Retroflex drying station #20094299. The employee was exposed to an approximate seven foot fall hazard. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement of this hazard is to follow the ladder manufacturer's safety labeling for proper climbing and use. Disclaimer: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: Designated emergency exits for working at the south side of the production facility were obstructed: a) The conveyor of the Mark Andy press obstructs access to the receiving dock exit. b) A tote of paper waste obstructs access to receiving dock exit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.147 D02
- Issued
- May 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the employer's energy control procedures required by this standard: Operators are exposed to the hazards of moving machine parts and in-going nip points while they set up and re-web printing presses, clean press rollers, and adjust slitters and blades during press operation. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machines are not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], stored energy [(d)(5), if applicable], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], are not implemented to safeguard employees from the machine servicing hazards: 1. This violation occurred on or about March 9, 2016 when an employee was allowed to perform work near the ingoing nip points created by the rollers of the Allied Gear printing press, Employer Identification #107, m/n 516 6N, s/n 971032. The operator caught her finger in the ingoing nip point created by the perf roller while attempting to re-web the flexographic printing press using the jog controls which resulted in a partial amputation of the finger. 2. The violation occurred on the following, but not limited to, printing presses: a) Allied Gear, Employer ID #101, m/n 2C108, s/n 802122 b) Webtron presses, Employer ID #102, m/n 650, s/n 41216E c) Allied Gear, Employer ID #103, m/n 2C108, s/n 84325 d) Webtron press, Employer ID #104, m/n 650, s/n 71246E e) Webtron press, Employer ID # 105, m/n 650, s/n 4440 f) Allied Gear, Employer ID #106, m/ MPDC108, s/n 88123 g) Mark Andy 2200 Series, Employer ID #108 h) Allied Gear 516, Employer ID #109, s/n 951010 i) Allied Gear 516, Employer ID #111 m/n 516 4C, s/n 991057 j) Mark Andy P7 printing press, Employer ID BP#1, s/n 1527991/2015, m/n P7-20 k) Allied Gear Press, Employer ID BP #2, m/n FM4 163, s/n 951036 l) Allied 500 Series, Employer ID BP #3, m/n 5203, s/n 1016AP 3. The violation occurred on the following, but not limited to, bag presses: m) Potdevin Bag Printing Press, employer ID #103B 602, unknown model and serial number with Windmoeller & Hoelscher Corp. priningt press OMS 992, equip. no. 22094 n) Potdevin Bag Printing Press, employer ID #103A 603, unknown model and serial number, quipped with Windmoeller & Hoelscher printing press, unknown equipment number. o) Potdevin Bag Printing Press, employer ID #605 also known as Bag Machine 83, s/n 1117, m/n 83
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3780
- — Z (S) $6300
1904.32 B06
- Issued
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6): 29 CFR 1904.32(b)(6) The annual summary was not posted no later than February 1 of the year following the year covered by the records, and kept in place until April 30: As of March 16, 2016, the employer failed to post the 2015 annual summary.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $540
- — Z (O) $900
More inspections at RX Systems, INC
View RX Systems, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341324267.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.