BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS ·
OSHA Inspection: SANDO CONTRACTING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANDO CONTRACTING in 956 SOUTH BEACH BLVD., BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 341330322.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDO CONTRACTING
- Site address
- 956 SOUTH BEACH BLVD.
- City
- BAY SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39520
- Mailing
- 706 SPANISH ACRES DR., BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) Northside of House - On or about March 14, 2016 employees removing material off the roof were lowered down from the roof on an unauthorized work platform were not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems .
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B03
- Issued
- Apr 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3): Each employee in a hoist area was not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Northside of House - On or about March 14, 2016 employees working on roof in hoist area were not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8 m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Apr 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178. EACH 1910 STANDARD USED MUST INCLUDE "AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d)" at the end of the SAVE. (a) Northside of House - On or about March 14, 2016 employer had an employee operate the all terrain industrial truck that has not been trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341330322.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.