MIAMI, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: SUDAMAR'S NEW FINISH PAINT & BODY SHOP INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SUDAMAR'S NEW FINISH PAINT & BODY SHOP INC in 10410 SW 184 TER, MIAMI, FL 33157 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341334522.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUDAMAR'S NEW FINISH PAINT & BODY SHOP INC
- Site address
- 10410 SW 184 TER
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33157
- Mailing
- 10410 SW 184 TER, MIAMI, FL 33157
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D03 II
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Storage cabinet(s) for flammable liquids were not designed or constructed to meet minimal fire resistance as required: On or about March 18,2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer used a refrigerator that did not meet the fire resistance requirements to store flammable chemicals used at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operation(s) exceeded the minimum required for operation: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer had stored inside the spray booth flammable chemicals that exceeded the minimum required for their daily operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.305 B01 I
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Openings through which conductors entered cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer had an electrical box not effectively closed by missing circuit breaker "blanks".
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program that would cover the different chemicals such as but not limited to the paint used by employees on-site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDS) for different chemicals such as but not limited to the paint used by employees on-site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide training for the different chemicals such as but not limited to the paint used by employees on-site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 H01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): The employer did not provide the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, at no cost to employees: On or about March 18,2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not pay for the necessary PPE such as but not limited to an air purifying respirator used by employees for painting activities at the paint shop.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $200
- · Z (O) $400
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide the information contained in the appendix D to employees using a 3M half-face air purifying respirator during painting operations at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $200
- · Z (O) $400
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: On or about March 18, 2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for those employees using a 3M half-face air purifying respirator during painting operations at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341334522.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.