KATY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: IGLOO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of IGLOO PRODUCTS CORPORATION in 777 IGLOO RD, KATY, TX 77494 (NAICS 452910). OSHA activity number 341342426.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IGLOO PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 777 IGLOO RD
- City
- KATY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77494
- Mailing
- 777 IGLOO RD, KATY, TX 77494
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 452910
- Employees
- 1200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to severe burns from the potential of dust explosions, deflagration and/or fire hazards caused by the accumulation of combustible plastic dusts in work areas that contained potential ignition sources. On or about March 21, 2016, and again on or about June 1, 2016: a. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, quantities of combustible dust were present on beams and on equipment in some locations greater than 1 inch in depth and were located on and above potential ignition sources such as unclassified motors, grinders, heated injectors and mold machines. b. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, the employer had not performed a dust hazard analysis in the areas. c. In the Katy North plant, the employer had not performed an incident investigation from an incident on December 28, 2013, that resulted in property damage and production shutdown time. d. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, the employer did not inspect on a routine basis the work areas for dust accumulation and the employer did not require cleaning of the areas on a routine basis. e. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, equipment such as grinders, dust socks, and dust filters were not maintained to perform as designed and operated in a manner that minimized the escape of dust. f. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, pneumatic conveying system designs were not documented to include information that could affect the fire protection of the process. g. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, an electrical classification evaluation was not performed for areas where combustible dust could be suspended in the air. h. In the Katy North and Katy South plants, training and certification of employees and contractors regarding combustible dust hazards was not provided.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12471
- — Z (S) $12471
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $6,235 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: On or about March 21, 2016: a. In the Katy North and Katy South production areas, where employees were exposed to slip and trip hazards from plastic dusts and chips when walking and working in the production areas without keeping all places of employment clean and orderly. b. In the Katy North and Katy South buildings, where employees were exposed to hazards from large accumulations of plastic dusts on overhead rafters and beams around equipment without keeping all places of employment clean and orderly. c. In the Katy North and Katy South production areas where employees are exposed hazards when walking and working in the production areas that had boxes and other materials located in aisles and walkways without keeping all places of employment orderly.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $6235
- — C (S) $12471
- — Z (S) $12471
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,345 · Current $5,345
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: On or about June 1, 2016, Katy South plant where employees were exposed to respiratory hazards when wearing NIOSH approved respirators without having been provided with the information contained in Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $5345
- — C (S) $5345
- — Z (S) $5345
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: On or about June 1, 2016, Katy South plant where employees were exposed to respiratory hazards when wearing NIOSH approved respirators without establishing and implementing elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure employees voluntarily using the respiratory are medically able to use the respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that it does not present a health hazard to the user.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $8,908 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: On or about March 21, 2016 in the Katy South warehouse where employees were exposed to struck-by and crushed-by hazards from stored products without being stacked so they are stable and secure against sliding or collapse.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $4500
- — C (S) $8908
- — Z (S) $8908
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $8,729 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: On or about March 21, 2016, in the Katy North and Katy South plants where employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards without having been trained on the physical and health hazards of the plastic dust in their work area.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $8729
- — C (S) $12471
- — Z (S) $12471
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: On or about March 21, 2016, in the Katy North and Katy South plants where employees were exposed to hazards without having been informed of the measures they could take to protect themselves from the plastic dust hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — R (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Igloo Products Corporation
View Igloo Products Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 452910)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341342426.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.