Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ONONDAGA CHIMNEY & MASONRY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONONDAGA CHIMNEY & MASONRY in 173 SEELEY AVENUE, SYRACUSE, NY 13205 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341345528.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Onondaga Chimney & Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Onondaga Chimney & Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
173 SEELEY AVENUE
City
SYRACUSE
State
NY
ZIP
13205
Mailing
105 ELLEN STREET, SYRACUSE, NY 13208
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was constructed with fall protection or fall that protection was provided for employees working at 12 feet, 17 feet, and 22 feet from ground.  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was fully planked at 6 feet, 12, feet, 17 feet, and 22 feet from ground.  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was built with mud sills when sitting on a soil foundation, and the employer did not ensure that employees had safe access to the scaffold.    Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that each working level of the tubular welded frame scaffold was fully planked.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.  a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that the 27 foot high scaffold employees worked on was secured from tipping.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was constructed with mud sills to provide adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that workers had a safe means of access to the scaffolding.  Workers climbed the scaffold frames.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  a)  At the jobsite, on the scaffold, on or about 3/22/16:  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold was constructed with fall protection or fall protection was provided for employees working at 12 feet, 17 feet, and 22 feet from ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Onondaga Chimney & Masonry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341345528.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.