RUTHERFORD, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: VILLA RESTORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VILLA RESTORATION in 108 MORSE AVENUE, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341347003.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VILLA RESTORATION
- Site address
- 108 MORSE AVENUE
- City
- RUTHERFORD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07070
- Mailing
- 38 PARK AVENUE, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. A) Exterior, On ground right side of house in the driveway: An employee was exposed to head injuries while working below roofing activities and was not protected with any type of head protection, on or about March 10th, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) A) Exterior, Roof: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet while engaged in roofing work on a residential structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about March 10th, 2016.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: A) Exterior, Right side of structure, in driveway: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet while using an extension ladder that was not extended at least 3 feet over the landing that the employees were accessing, on or about March 10th 2016.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341347003.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.