Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: M.H. MURPHY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of M.H. MURPHY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY in BUILDING 15 ASHERTON GROVE DRIVE, WESTERVILLE, OH 43081 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 341350403.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M.H. Murphy Development Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M.H. Murphy Development Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BUILDING 15 ASHERTON GROVE DRIVE
City
WESTERVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
43081
Mailing
4442 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY, GROVEPORT, OH 43125
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
15
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.     a. On or before March 24, 2016, M.H. Murphy Development Company did not require and enforce the use of fall protection by subcontractors during framing and roof sheeting work. This violation was most recently observed at Asherton Grove Drive, Building 15, Westerville, Ohio, 43018, where 7 employees were not protected from fall hazards of 9 feet, 4 inches to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2040

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341350403.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.