Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AEROQUEST, INC.

Follow-up inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of AEROQUEST, INC. in 100 BOULDERBROOK CIR, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30045 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341354512.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aeroquest, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aeroquest, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AEROQUEST, INC.
Site address
100 BOULDERBROOK CIR
City
LAWRENCEVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30045
Mailing
100 BOULDERBROOK CIR, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30045
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
74
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,997 · Current $3,157 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder.    On or about March 28, 2016 employees were exposed to fall hazards where the employer provided an overhead storage area 9 feet, 8-1/2 inches above lower level and did not provide a standard rail.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3157
  • — C (S) $5997
  • — Z (S) $5997

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $7,496 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Each circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut?    On or about March 28, 2016 employees in the Trim Room were exposed to amputation hazards where the "Powermatic" table saw was operated without a blade guard in place while cutting "core foam", wood, or medium density fiberboard.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $7496
  • — Z (S) $7496

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,498 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors enter were not effectively closed.    a. On or about March 28, 2016 employees operating the "Powermatic" table saw in the Trim Room were exposed to electrical hazards where electrical conductors entering the bottom of a "Furnas" electrical box attached to the table saw were not protected from abrasion.    b.   On or about March 28, 2016 employees operating the "Powermatic" table saw in the Trim Room were exposed to electrical hazards where an opening through which conductors entered on the side of the "Furnas" box attached to the table saw was not effectively closed and the conductors entering were not protected from abrasion.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $4498
  • — Z (S) $4498

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed.  On or about March 28, 2016 employees operating the "Powermatic" table saw in the Trim Room were exposed to electrical hazards where an unused opening on the face of a "Furnas" electrical box attached to the table saw was not closed.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  On or about March 28, 2016 employees operating the "Powermatic" table saw in the Trim Room were exposed to electrical hazards where conductors entering the side of the "Furnas" electrical box attached to the table saw were not provided strain relief.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV D

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,498 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D): Flexible cords and cables were used where attached to building surfaces.    a.  On or about June 22, in the Cabinetry Area an employee was exposed to electrical hazards where the employer provided a flexible cord attached to building surfaces and which was used to provide power to a "Ridgid" wet/dry vacuum and a "Comfort Zone" fan.    b.  On or about June 22, in the Cabinetry Area an employee was exposed to electrical hazards where the employer provided a cord and plug connected "Comfort Zone" fan the cord of which was attached by two metal staples to a wood tool cabinet.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $4498
  • — Z (S) $4498

1910.134 E01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,583 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.     On or about March 28, 2016 the employer did not ensure that all employees provided with elastomeric respirators were provided medical evaluations before being fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.       Aeroquest, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number1079951, citation number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on January 27, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 100 Boulderbrook Circle in Lawrenceville, Georgia.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $6000
  • — C (R) $10583
  • — Z (R) $10583

1910.134 F01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph  On or about March 28, 2016 not all employees required by the employer to wear tight-fitting facepiece respirators in the Trim Room where exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated during cutting, trimming, and grinding were provided an appropriate fit test.   Aeroquest, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1079951, citation number 1, item number 1c and was affirmed as a final order on January 27, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 100 Boulderbrook Circle in Lawrenceville, Georgia.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $0
  • — C (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.303 B02

Repeat Gravity 1 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,583 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled equipment was not installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling.    a.  On or about March 28, 2016 employees were exposed to electrical and fire hazards in the Cabinetry Area where two relocatable power taps were attached to a cabinetry technician's table to provide power to various hand tools including heat guns, glue guns, and routers.    b.  On or about March 28, 2016 employees were exposed to electrical and fire hazards in the Cabinetry Area where two relocatable power taps were daisy chained to provide receptacles on two sides of a cabinetry technician's table to provide power to various hand tools including heat guns, glue guns, and routers.    c.  On or about March 28, 2016 employees were exposed to electrical and fire hazards in the Cabinetry Area where the employer provided a metal electrical enclosure in which electric receptacles were installed to provide power to relocatable power taps.  The electrical enclosure, designed to be securely fastened in place, was unsecured and lying on the floor.    Aeorqeust, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1079951, citation number 1, item number 3a and was affirmed as a final order on January 27, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 100 Boulderbrook Circle in Lawrenceville, Georgia.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $6000
  • — C (R) $10583
  • — Z (R) $10583

View Aeroquest, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341354512.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.