Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RESSLER SIDING & WINDOWS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RESSLER SIDING & WINDOWS in 102 EAST AVENUE A, BISMARCK, ND 58501 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341358174.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ressler Siding & Windows — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ressler Siding & Windows is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
102 EAST AVENUE A
City
BISMARCK
State
ND
ZIP
58501
Mailing
2020 46TH AVENUE SE, MANDAN, ND 58554
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding was used in absence of fully planked working surfaces, an adequate firm foundation, suitable access, and fall protection systems at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolding was not fully planked or decked:  (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding had approximately two thirds of the working level planked at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding was used with rollers while set on soil at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Portable ladder, hook-on ladder, attachable ladder, stair tower, stairway-type ladder, ramp, runway, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used to access scaffold platform more than 2 feet above or below a point of access:  (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" While climbing the scaffold end frames for access at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected by experienced and trained employees under the supervision of a competent person:  (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding was used in absence of fully planked working surfaces, an adequate firm foundation, suitable access, and fall protection systems at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.    (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding was used in absence of fall protection systems at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.    (b) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 15" where a bronco scaffold was used in absence of fall protection systems at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  (a) On or about March 23, 2016 for an employee exposed to potential fall hazards of approximately 11' 6" where fabricated frame scaffolding was used in absence of fully planked working surfaces, an adequate firm foundation, suitable access, and fall protection systems at 102 East Avenue A in Bismarck, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury, or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:     (a) For calendar year 2016, the employer did not maintain OSHA or equivalent 300 logs where an employee sustained a work-related injury in January of 2016 at 2020 46th Avenue SE in Mandan, ND.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

View Ressler Siding & Windows's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341358174.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.