Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M&W DISTRIBUTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M&W DISTRIBUTION in 1775 WESTGATE PKWY, ATLANTA, GA 30336 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 341361822.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M&W Distribution — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M&W Distribution is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M&W DISTRIBUTION
Site address
1775 WESTGATE PKWY
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30336
Mailing
1775 WESTGATE PKWY, ATLANTA, GA 30336
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
120
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing for likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burns to the eyes from hazardous material such as but not limited to silica or lime:  a.) Warehouse: The employer did not ensure the emergency eye wash/shower station was inspected annually and activated weekly to ensure operability and availability of water. The employees are required to perform task such as but not limited to change out or add water to corrosive hazardous material such as but not limited to batteries and exposed to potential eye irritations, redness, skin burns or irreversible corneal damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    a.) Warehouse: The employer stored exposed employees to fire and entrapment hazards by not keeping the emergency exit door free and unobstructed when storing logistical products in an exit access route.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met   a)Warehouse Area: The employer did not establish a written hazard communication program for the employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to ChemStation, a corrosive scrubber,  that has the potential to cause severe skin burns, eye irritation, or irreversible cornea damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  a. Facility: The employer did not ensure Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 13, 2016
Abate by
Aug 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a) Facility: The employees have not received training on the new labeling requirements and safety data sheet format.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View M&W Distribution's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341361822.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.