SHELBYVILLE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: TYSON FOODS, INC./TYSON FOODS
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TYSON FOODS, INC./TYSON FOODS in 1019 SHELBYVILLE STREET, SHELBYVILLE, TX 75973 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 341363729.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TYSON FOODS, INC./TYSON FOODS
- Site address
- 1019 SHELBYVILLE STREET
- City
- SHELBYVILLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75973
- Mailing
- 1019 SHELBYVILLE STREET, CENTER, TX 75935
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311615
- Employees
- 1500
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $9,688 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(b)(1): Two exit routes. At least two exit routes must be available in a workplace to permit prompt evacuation of employees and other building occupants during an emergency, except as allowed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The exit routes must be located as far away as practical from each other so that if one exit route is blocked by fire or smoke, employees can evacuate using the second exit route: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, and at times before, the employer exposed employees to ammonia inhalation, fire, and explosion hazards when it did not have at least two exit routes for employees evacuation in engine room #2.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $9687.5
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit must be clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit." On or about March 28, 2016, and at times before, the employer exposed employees to inhalation and fire hazards when it did not have doors marked with an exit sign. (a) The new install door in engine room #2 does not have an exit sign posted for employees egress. (b) The door that leads to the production area, in the hallway, near engine room #2 does not have an exit sign on the door to let employees know where to egress.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): If the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge is not immediately apparent, signs must be posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge. Additionally, the line-of-sight to an exit sign must clearly be visible at all times: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, and times before, operators/maintenance working in in engine room #2 where signs were not posted indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $9,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign must be illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color. Self-luminous or electroluminescent signs that have a minimum luminance surface value of at least .06 footlamberts (0.21 cd/m2) are permitted: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, and times before, operators/maintenance working in Process Safety Management where doors exit signs were not illuminated. At least two (2) employees per shift egress through the two doors of Engine Room #1. (b) On or about March 28, 2016, and at times before, the employer exposed employees to inhalation and fire hazards when it did not have doors marked with an exit sign. The new install door in Engine Room #2 does not have an exit sign posted for employees egress. (c) On or about March 28, 2016, and times before, operators/maintenance employees working in Engine Room #2 where signs were not posted indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $9687.5
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, the employer did not prohibit unauthorized access to engine room #1 in accordance with requirements, such as, but not limited to, ANSI/ASHRAE 15-1992, Safety Code for Mechanical Refrigeration standard, paragraph 11.13.6; exposing employees to fire and ammonia inhalation hazards. (b) On or about March 28, 2016, the door entering engine room #1 was not self-closing in accordance with requirements, such as, but not limited to IIAR Bulletin No. 110, 3/93, Revised 3/02, 2/04, and 6/07, Guidelines for: Start-up, Inspection and Maintenance of Ammonia Mechanical Refrigerating Systems, Appendix D-Machinery Rooms and Auxiliary Safety equipment, paragraph D.2 Access, Exit and Containment; thereby exposing employees to fire and ammonia inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.119 F03
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The operating procedures were not reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflect current operating practice, including changes that result from changes in process chemicals, technology, and equipment, and changes to facilities. The employer did not certify annually that these operating procedures are current and accurate: (a) The employer did not ensure that the following operating procedures were certified: SOP RECIRC-LTR Operation of Recirculator & Ammonia Pumps SOP-AP-1 Operation of Purger and Control Bank SOP-IM-1 Operation of Heat Exchanger-Control Bank & Surge Drum SOP-WC-1 Operation of Heat Exchanger-Control Bank & Surge Drum
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.119 J04 III
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iii): The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment shall be consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, and at times before, the employer did not ensure that inspection and tests of the ammonia detection in the engine room was consistent with applicable manufacturers recommendations and good engineering practices. Calibration of the ammonia detectors was not performed every six months in accordance with the anufacturers recommendations.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.119 J04 IV
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer did not document each inspection and test that has been performed on process equipment. The documentation shall identify the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test: Calibration of the ammonia detectors was not performed every six months in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $9,688 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Services, feeders, and branch circuits. Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, were not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident: (a) On or about March 28, 2016, and at times before, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards when it did not have the electrical panel box marked in engine room #2.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $9687.5
- · C (S) $12471
- · Z (S) $12471
More inspections at Tyson Foods, Inc./Tyson Foods
View Tyson Foods, Inc./Tyson Foods's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311615)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341363729.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.