Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARK MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARK MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE, INC. in 1765 PARK AVENUE, PLOVER, WI 54467 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 341364040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mark Motors Automotive, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mark Motors Automotive, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1765 PARK AVENUE
City
PLOVER
State
WI
ZIP
54467
Mailing
1765 PARK AVE., PLOVER, WI 54467
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441110
Employees
48
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    a)    On or about 3/31/2016, Employer had not completed personal air monitoring for the employee spraying chemicals used for rust proofing or employees in the surrounding area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1487.5
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.134 E07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(7)(i): The employer did not provide additional medical evaluations that complied with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134 when an employee reported medical signs or symptoms that were related to ability to use a respirator:  On or about 3/31/2016, Employer had not completed a physician's evaluation of an employee to recertify him within 2 years of his previous exam in compliance with the 3M Authorized Service Provider. (11/26/2013)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:  On or about 3/31/2016, Employer had not completed a respirator fit test for employee spraying rust proofing since 11/17/2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:   On or about 3/31/2016, Employer had not completed annual training for employee since 11/17/2009.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
Apr 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  a)    On or about 3/31/2016, Two pedestal fans and four extension cords were available for use in the detailing area of the shop with missing ground pins on the plugs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1487.5
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)    On or about 3/31/2016, employer had not developed a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 16 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2016
Abate by
May 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  a)    On or about 3/31/2016, employer had not labeled all secondary containers in use in the detailers area of the service center.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341364040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.