Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: OVIDIO BLANCO GUEVARA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OVIDIO BLANCO GUEVARA in 4415 MUNGER AVENUE, DALLAS, TX 75204 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341364420.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ovidio Blanco Guevara for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ovidio Blanco Guevara is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4415 MUNGER AVENUE
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75204
Mailing
6926 ROSA LINDA LANE, DALLAS, TX 75217
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):     a) At the new multi-family residential construction site, where at least one employee was operating a powered industrial truck without having first completed training consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:     a)  At the new multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working in areas where overhead hazards existed without the use of head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(d):  All portable, power-driven circular saws were not equipped with guards above and below the base plate or shoe. The lower guard did not cover the saw to the depth of the teeth, except for the minimum arc required to allow proper retraction and contact with the work. When the tool is withdrawn from the work, the lower guard did not automatically and instantly return to the covering position:    a)  At the new multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using a Makita circular saw with the lower guard in the opened position.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):  Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:     a)      At the multi-family construction site where employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than 6-feet above the ground level below while applying decking to the top of the building without the use of a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1051 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a)(1): A stairway or ladder was not provided at all personnel points of access where there is a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:    a)  At the multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to fall hazards while using the stud framed walls as access/egress to the upper landings.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $560
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2016
Abate by
Apr 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  a)  At the multi-family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to fall hazards while using an extension ladder that did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341364420.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.