OSHA Inspection: BOYKO CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED

Issued

Sep 21, 2016

Abate by

Nov 10, 2016

Penalty

Initial $400 · Current $400

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.     Boyko Construction Incorporated, failed to submit documents to OSHA verifying that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  01                                                 1a, 1b                                         06/23/2016

Issued

Sep 21, 2016

Abate by

Nov 10, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  The employer failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Boyko Construction Incorporated, failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                           Abatement Date  1                                               02                                            05/18/2016     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

May 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 23, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to maintain, implement, and develop a written hazard communication program. An employee was exposed to eye, skin contact and respiratory tract chemical hazards associated with chemicals, such as but not limited to silica dust.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).

Issued

May 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 23, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing masonry demolition work was not trained on the hazards of masonry demolition work, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with silica dust.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).

Issued

May 6, 2016

Abate by

May 18, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing masonry demolition work was not wearing safety glasses, exposing employees to hazards associated with eye injuries.  Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).

Issued

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:  On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was performing masonry demolition work from a scaffold platform that was not fully planked, exposing the employee to fall hazards of approximately fourteen (14) feet.   There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.

Issued

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing masonry demolition work from a scaffold and was not provided with a safe means of access to the scaffold, exposing the employee to fall hazards of approximately twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet.   There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.

Issued

May 6, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   On or about March 23, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing masonry demolition work from fabricated frame scaffold systems, approximately twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet above the ground, was exposed to fall hazards.  There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.