HOLLYWOOD, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: ABU RABAH INC
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of ABU RABAH INC in 54150 DAVIE ROAD EXTENSION, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33024 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341376358.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABU RABAH INC
- Site address
- 54150 DAVIE ROAD EXTENSION
- City
- HOLLYWOOD
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33024
- Mailing
- 4152 INVERRARY DR, LAUDERHILL, FL 33319
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about March 30, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to struck-by eye injuries while installing metal lath with pneumatic staple guns and using adhesive without a means of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3563
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,850 · Current $2,850
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about March 30, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9 feet while using an extension ladder that was not extended 3 feet above the upper roof landing and lacked a grasping device.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2850
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,850 · Current $2,850
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: On or about March 30, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of about 9 feet while using an extension ladder that did not conform with the 1:4 horizontal-to-vertical ratio.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2850
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. On or about March 30, 2016, at the above addressed job site, employees who had not been provided training in the use of ladders were exposed to a fall hazard of about 9 feet while working from an extension ladder.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about March 30, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not implement, develop and make available a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to and handling Titebond Weatherproof Subfloor Adhesive while installing stucco corner bead mesh.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at ABU Rabah INC
View ABU Rabah INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341376358.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.