Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TELCON, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TELCON, LLC in 1677 MILLER PKWY., STREETSBORO, OH 44241 (NAICS 331529). OSHA activity number 341379642.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Telcon, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Telcon, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TELCON, LLC
Site address
1677 MILLER PKWY.
City
STREETSBORO
State
OH
ZIP
44241
Mailing
1677 MILLER PKWY., STREETSBORO, OH 44241
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331529
Employees
44
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to provide employees with the information contained in Appendix D of the standard. Employees are permitted to voluntarily wear filtering-face pieces; N95 dust masks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1025 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period:    On or about May 3, 2016, employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissable exposure limit (PEL). Exposure to lead causes cumulative neurological, blood, and reporductive disease, as well as, kidney failure in humans. Engineering and work practice controls can be used to reduce employee exposure.    a) An employee operating the lead melting and casting equipment in the Melt Booth was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration of 68 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (ug/m3) which is 1.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ug/m3. The sampling was performed for 339 minutes during one shift on May 3, 2016. Zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled period of time (141 minutes).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1025 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year where engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were feasible but did not reduce the employees' exposure to or below the permissible exposure limit the employer did not use engineering and/or work practice controls to reduce esposures to the lowest feasible level:    For the employees including, but not limited to, the employee whose exposure is described in Citation 1, Item 1(b).     On or about May 3, 2016, the employee operating the melting and casting equipment in the Melt Booth was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration of 68 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (ug/m3) which is 1.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 ug/m3. The sampling was performed for 339 minutes during one shift on May 3, 2016. Zero exposure was assumed for the un-sampled period of time (141 minutes).  At this time employees are being exposed to levels above the PEL and the employer shall require mandatory use of a respirator until feasible engineering controls can be put in place.     General methods of control include, but are not limited to:   1. Use an exhaust ventilation system to capture lead.    2. Use administrative controls to minimize employee exposure time.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1025 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to adequately establish and implement a written program to reduce employee exposure to lead below the permissible exposure limit, by means of engineering and administrative controls.     a) On May 3, 2016, OSHA air sampling indicated that employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit; air sampling indicated that an employee was expsoed to 68 ug/m3 of lead time weighted over 8-hours for a sampling period of 339 minutes (no expsoure was assumed for the 141 minutes of unsampled time). The PEL for lead is 50 ug/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1025 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 47 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to keep surfaces in the breakroom free of lead. These surfaces include, but are not limited to, the refrigerator and vending machine(s).     OSHA conducted lead wipe samples on April 4, 2016 of surfaces in the break room; the refrigerator- handle and door, and the vending machine (vending machine nearest to the refrigerator)- buttons and money intake. The results indicated that there was lead expsoure on the surfaces;     a) the refrigerator had 74.69 micrograms of lead per square foot.    b) the vending machine had 113.70 micrograms of lead per square foot.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1025 I03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees who are exposed to lead above the PEL shower at the end of their work shift. The employer requires that employees wash their hands and faces, but does not require them to shower.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1025 I03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to shower per 29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)i) did not leave the workplace wearing any clothing or equipment worn during the work shift:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees who are exposed to lead above the PEL do not leave the workplace with clothing or equipment worn during the workshift. Employees in the melt shop frequently go to their personal vehicles for breaks while wearing their uniforms, which are worn during the workshift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Aug 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure:    On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to provide the employees on the first aid team with the Hepatitis B Vaccine. The employer does not have a written exposure control plan that specifically addresses the provision of the Hepatitis B Vaccine to all unvaccinated first responders who may render assistance and be exposed to blood or other potentially infectious material.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.157 G02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 33 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Aug 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to train employees on the use of fire extinguishers at least annually. Employees are permitted to use fire extinguishers to fight incipient stage fires.   Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:   1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.   2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).   3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2016
Abate by
Sep 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:      On or about April 4, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that powered industrial vehicles (PIV) are inspected daily. PIVs are used daily in the melt shop.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Telcon, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341379642.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.