Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: PROTECH NUTRACEUTICALS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PROTECH NUTRACEUTICALS, INC. in 10321 72ND ST., LARGO, FL 33777 (NAICS 446191). OSHA activity number 341381671.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Protech Nutraceuticals, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Protech Nutraceuticals, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10321 72ND ST.
City
LARGO
State
FL
ZIP
33777
Mailing
10321 72ND ST., LARGO, FL 33777
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
446191
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Manufacturing areas - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to nutrition powders and alcohol. Violation observed on or about 4/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  a. Manufacturing areas - the employer did not provide safety data sheets for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to nutrition powders and alcohol. Violation observed on or about 4/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Manufacturing areas - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to nutrition powders and alcohol. Violation observed on or about 4/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a. Manufacturing areas - the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D when employees voluntarily used respirators.  Violation observed on or about 4/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. Manufacturing areas - employees that voluntarily used half face respirators were not provided medical evaluations.  Violation observed on or about 4/6/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341381671.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.