SAN ANTONIO, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: PUGAS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PUGAS CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 10500 N.W. MILITARY HWY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341382372.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PUGAS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 10500 N.W. MILITARY HWY
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78230
- Mailing
- 1933 N. DELAWARE AVE, TULSA, OK 74110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- May 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms, and were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: On or about April 6, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than ten feet to the ground level below, while attaching Tyvek insulating wrap from a temporary elevated work platform attached to the forks of a Skytrak telehandler (Model 6036), which was not designed by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- May 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): A forkift was used to support a scaffold platform, and the entire platform was not attached to the fork: On or about April 6, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than ten feet to the ground below, while attaching Tyvek insulating wrap from a temporary elevated work platform that was not fully attached to the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- May 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On or about April 6, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than ten feet to the ground below, while attaching Tyvek insulating wrap from a temporary elevated work platform that was elevated with a Skytrak telehandler (Model 6036) without using a personal fall protection system or guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $750
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- May 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified to recognize the hazards associated with fall hazards and falling objects in the work area: On or about April 6, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than ten feet to the ground below, while attaching Tyvek insulating wrap to the exterior walls of a commercial building from a temporary elevated work platform that was elevated with a Skytrak telehandler, Model 6036, without being trained in fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On or about April 6, 2016, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by flying projectiles, while using a staple gun to attach sheets of Tyvek insulating wrap to the exterior of the builidng without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Pugas Construction, INC.
View Pugas Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341382372.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.