Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL PLASTEX, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GENERAL PLASTEX, INC. in 35 STUVER PL., BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341382489.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Plastex, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Plastex, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 STUVER PL.
City
BARBERTON
State
OH
ZIP
44203
Mailing
35 STUVER PL., BARBERTON, OH 44203
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.110 E04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(e)(4)(iii): Permanent and removable fuel containers were not securely mounted to prevent jarring loose, slipping, or rotating:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that the propane tank on the Orange Nissan Datsun 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle (PIV Serial Number was illegible) was secured.  Both metal latches that were in place over the propane tank installed on this PIV were found in the unlatched/unsecured position.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that the Orange Nissan Datsun 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle (PIV Serial Number was illegible) was taken out of service when it was found to be defective.  Defects were found on the vehicle, including but not limited to:  an unsecured propane tank, an illegible name plate and an after market Lever Lock braking component installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:   On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that pre-operational inspections were being performed on the Orange Nissan Datsun 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle (PIV Serial Number was illegible).  Defects were found on the vehicle, including but not limited to:  an unsecured propane tank, an illegible name plate and an after market Lever Lock braking component installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that the name plate on the Orange Datsun Nissan 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle was in a legible condition.  The name plate had no discernible markings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that devices used for the purposes of Control of Hazardous Energy (Lock Out Tag Out) while working on either of the two Keystone Crane and Hoist 7.5 ton overhead gantry cranes were singularly identified in that the employer had in place standard locks/keys which were not assigned.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to conduct an annual review of their Lock Out/Tag Out Procedures.   Written machine specific procedures were done in 1999 .  There was an acquisition of one additional item (gantry crane) in 2011 which was not added to the program.  No documentation of any annual reviews submitted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 A04

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to secure written approval from the manufacturer of the Datsun Nissan 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle prior to installing a "LeverLock" parking brake mechanism on the vehicle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees who were operating the Orange Datsun Nissan 4000 Powered Industrial vehicle were trained and certified to operate it every three years.  The last documented training was in 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.178 Q07

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employee were performing a pre-operational inspection of the Orange Datsun Nissan 4000 Powered Industrial Vehicle before it was placed in service at the beginning of each shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that frequent inspections were being performed on the two Keystone Crane and Sling 7.5 ton overhead gantry cranes where the cranes were in use daily in the main facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:  On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that periodic inspections were being perform on the two Keystone Crane and Sling 7.5 ton overhead gantry cranes at least annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 N03 VI

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(3)(vi): The employer did not require that the operator of crane(s) avoid carrying loads over people:  On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employee were not carrying loads of material over other employees heads while using either of the two Keystone Crane and Sling 7.5 overhead gantry cranes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1904.33 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $280 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300 log, the privacy case list, the annual summary  and the OSHA 301 Incident Report forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that those records covered.    On or about April 6, 2016, the employer failed to produce upon request OSHA 300 and 300 A logs.  Logs were not maintained for the years 2012-2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $280
  • — Z (O) $400

View General Plastex, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341382489.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.