MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: MAHET'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of MAHET'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC in 8900 N. KENDALL DRIVE, MIAMI, FL 33176 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 341389252.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAHET'S CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC
- Site address
- 8900 N. KENDALL DRIVE
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33176
- Mailing
- 1410 POLK CITY ROAD, HAINES CITY, FL 33844
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238390
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: On or about 8/22/2016, the employer did not send abatement documentation for citation 2 and item 1, contained in Inspection #1138925, which was issued on 7/27/2016.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On or about April 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working from a baker's scaffold applying cement on a vertical wall adjacent to an opening on the 4th floor garage was not protected from fall hazards due to the top rail being 31.5 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59): On or about April 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as cement and silica being used when applying stucco. PLEASE NOTE: DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238390)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341389252.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.