Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL RASCON

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAFAEL RASCON in 500 BLOCK HERITAGE DRIVE, ATKINSON, IL 61235 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341392934.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rafael Rascon for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rafael Rascon is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAFAEL RASCON
Site address
500 BLOCK HERITAGE DRIVE
City
ATKINSON
State
IL
ZIP
61235
Mailing
826 W 15TH STREET, DAVENPORT, IA 52804
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:      On or about April 12, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing work and the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:    On or about April 12, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing work and a competent person did not conduct a safety inspection of the job site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:                                                                       On or about April 12, 2016, an employee was operating a pneumatic nail gun installing shingles on a residential roof and the employer did not ensure the employee wore safety glasses while operating the nail gun.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:      On or about April 12, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet 6 inches while installing roofing material on a residential roof and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and  the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:      On or about April 12, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard when using a ladder to access the roof of a new constructed residential home and the side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 26, 2016
Abate by
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all ladders:    On or about April 12, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards because the side rails of the ladder did not extend at least three feet above the eave and the employer had not ensured that each employee had been trained by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341392934.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.