LUBBOCK, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: REAGOR AUTO MALL
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REAGOR AUTO MALL in 1313 19TH STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79401 (NAICS 441310). OSHA activity number 341397743.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REAGOR AUTO MALL
- Site address
- 1313 19TH STREET
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79401
- Mailing
- 1211 19TH STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441310
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2): The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury. In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because the walls in the shop were not smooth enough to prevent residue build up.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3780
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because residue was buidling up along the walls and wires of the spray room.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 B10
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10): 29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10): Illumination panels did not effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit is located. Employees in the spray room engaged in spray painting automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because lighting units were not isolated and protected so as to make breakage unlikely.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3780
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 C05
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s): In the spray room employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because electrical wiring was not explosion-proof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 D02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(2): 29 CFR 1910.107(d)(2): Spraying area(s) were not provided with mechanical ventilation adequate to remove flammable vapors, mists or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues: In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because the spray room was not provided with any mechanical ventilation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3780
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 degrees F (93 degrees C) kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift: In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because flammable liquids were being stored in the spray room that were not being used to spray with that day.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3780
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 G07
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "NO SMOKING" sign(s) in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at spraying area(s) and paint storage room(s): In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to explosion hazards because there were no "No Smoking" signs set up around the spray room.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: In the spray room, employees engaged in spraying automobiles were exposed to chemicals hazards because safety data sheets were not being kept on-site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341397743.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.