Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FELIPE SANTOS, DBA SANTOS HOME IMPROVEMENT

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FELIPE SANTOS, DBA SANTOS HOME IMPROVEMENT in 26 WATERBURY RD., PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341400786.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Felipe Santos, DBA Santos Home Improvement for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Felipe Santos, DBA Santos Home Improvement is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
26 WATERBURY RD.
City
PROSPECT
State
CT
ZIP
06712
Mailing
281 EAST AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06854
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold from that the employees were working was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1080
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the pump jack scaffold were trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the pump jack scaffold at heights above 10 feet were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1540
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,080 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the poles of the pump jack scaffold that employees were required to work from were braced or secured at the bottom of the poles.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1080
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
May 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns to install siding were wearing eye protection.       Santos Home Improvement & Contracting, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1069592, Citation Number 1, Item Number 2, issued on 9/21/2015 with respect to a workplace located at 281 Todd Rd., Wolcott, CT and became a final order on 10/20/2015.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $2600
  • · Z (R) $4000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341400786.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.