FAIRFIELD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: COUNTRY HOME CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COUNTRY HOME CONSTRUCTION LLC in 938 FAIRFIELD BEACH ROAD, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341408268.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COUNTRY HOME CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 938 FAIRFIELD BEACH ROAD
- City
- FAIRFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06824
- Mailing
- 13 RAQUEL DRIVE, DANBURY, CT 06811
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: Jobsite: The supported poles of the pump jack scaffold were not set up on base plates, sill plates or other adequate foundation to prevent bottom of the poles from sinking into the ground.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Jobsite: The supported poles of the pump jack scaffold from which employees were working were not secured to the structure at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees who were working from the Pump-jack scaffold platforms were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 19 feet to the ground by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E08
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and/or 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface: Jobsite: Direct access from/to the scaffold platform to/from the open window sill that was used as a means of access was greater than 24 inches vertical distance.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Jobsite: The employees who were working from the pump jack scaffold without fall protection and incorrectly set up were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with pump jack scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.454 B
- Issued
- May 20, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. Jobsite: The employees that were involved in erecting, maintaining and inspecting the pump jack scaffold were not trained by a competent person to recognize hazards associated with the scaffold erection and set up.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341408268.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.