NEW BRITAIN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: U-HAUL
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of U-HAUL in 900 WEST MAIN STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06051 (NAICS 532120). OSHA activity number 341414092.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U-HAUL
- Site address
- 900 WEST MAIN STREET
- City
- NEW BRITAIN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06051
- Mailing
- 900 WEST MAIN STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 532120
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": U-Haul storage and garage areas On or about4/29/16, the exit door from the storage area and garage was not clearly visible from either area. The door and sign above the door are located in a small vestibule accessed through a doorway from the occupied areas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3150
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: U-Haul Storage Area and Garage On or about 4/29/16, the exit routes were not clearly marked in two instances: a.) The storage area and the aisles within that space b.) The garage or hitch bay, which has a door that leads to the vestibule where the exit door is located
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): U-Haul Storage Area On or about 4/29/16, in the following two instances, doors in the storage area, were not labeled that they were not exits. Both doors had combination locks on the storage side, which did not allow passage without entering the combination. a.) Door leading from the storage area into the store. b.) Door leading from the storage area into the hitch bay/garage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color: U-Haul Hitch Bay/Garage On or about 4/29/16, the exit door in the hitch bay/ garage area did not have an illuminated sign in a distinct color. The only sign indicating where to exit was a piece of paper on the door with a message that read "Fire Exit Keep Clear" in black ink.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B07
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(7): Each exit sign did not have the word "Exit" in plainly eligible letters not less than six inches (15.2 cm) high, with the principal strokes of the letters in the word "Exit" not less than three fourths of an inch (1.9 cm) wide: U-Haul Hitch Bay/Garage On or about 4/29/16, the door from the garage area to the exit door did not have an exit sign that indicated the word "Exit" in large enough print to be legible by occupants in the area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1001 J04 IV
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4)(iv): 29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4)(iv): At the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in which employees reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain asbestos containing material (ACM) and/or presumed asbestos containing material (PACM), the building owner did not post signs which identify the material which is present, its location, and appropriate work practices which, if followed, will ensure that ACM and/or PACM will not be disturbed. U-Haul Basement On or about 4/29/16, PACM was on the boiler and pipes in the basement. The PACM was in an area that could be damaged and had some damage that occurred at an unknown time. There were no signs indicating that the basement contained PACM, where it was or how to avoid disturbing/damaging it.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3150
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.1001 J05 I
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i): The employer did not affix signs or labels so that employees would be notified of what materials contain ACM and/or PACM to materials that were previously identified to be ACM and/or PACM U-Haul Basement On or about 4/29/16, PACM was on the furnace and pipes in the basement. The PACM was in an area that could be damaged and had some damage that occurred at an unknown time. There were no signs or labels indicating what materials were presumed to contain asbestos or how to avoid disturbing/damaging it.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.36 G04
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(4): Objects projecting into the exit route reduced the width of the exit route to less than the minimum width requirements for exit routes: U-Haul, Storage Area On or about 4/29/16, movable stairs were in the aisle in front of storage unit #1221, reducing the exit route to less than 28 inches.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at U-Haul
View U-Haul's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 532120)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341414092.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.