Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARTINS ROOFING LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MARTINS ROOFING LLC in 36 MAPLE AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341417905.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Martins Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martins Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTINS ROOFING LLC
Site address
36 MAPLE AVENUE
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
289 FAIRFIELD AVENUE, FL2, HARTFORD, CT 06114
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
B

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  Location: 36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    Each employee utilizing a pneumatic air gun while installing plywood sheathing on the roof exposed to potential eye injuries was not with eye protection and required to utilize eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Location:  36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    A ladder jack scaffold was not erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Location: 36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    The scaffold platform on the ladder jack scaffold 12 feet above the ground was not equipped with a fall protection system or guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Location:  36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    Each employee performing work on the ladder jack scaffold was not trained by a qualified person in the appropriate subject matter to recognized the hazards associated with ladder jack scaffolds and the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Location:  36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    Each employee involved with erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining or inspecting ladder jack scaffolds was not trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining or inspecting ladder jack scaffolds.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Location: 36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450  The 10 in 12 pitched residential type roof with an eave to ground fall distance of 15 feet to ground was not equipped with a guardrail system, personal fall arrest system, safety net system or alternative fall protection measure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Sep 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Location: 36 Maple Avenue, Meriden, CT 06450    Each employee exposed to fall hazards up to 15 feet above the ground while performing roofing work a 10 in 12 pitched residential type roof was not provided with a training program to recognize the hazards of falls and the procedures in order to minimize and/or eliminate those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Martins Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341417905.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.