LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SAMUEL RANGEL CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAMUEL RANGEL CONSTRUCTION in 7205 KEWANEE AVENUE, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341418325.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SAMUEL RANGEL CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 7205 KEWANEE AVENUE
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79424
- Mailing
- 512 44TH ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79404
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $648 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. Employees engaged in roofing operations were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $648
- — Z (S) $1080
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,512 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Employees engaged in roofing work without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards of more than six feet while moving and holding materials on the roof of the structure
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1512
- — Z (S) $2520
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,160 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Employees, without certification, were exposed to caught-in hazards while operating powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2160
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,160 · Current $1,296 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1296
- — Z (S) $2160
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341418325.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.