Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IG GREAT EXTERIORS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IG GREAT EXTERIORS, LLC in 4 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE, WESTPORT, CT 06880 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341422061.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch IG Great Exteriors, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for IG Great Exteriors, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE
City
WESTPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06880
Mailing
98 HARRIS STREET, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    The employees, installing roofing materials in the following locations with pneumatic nailing devices were not wearing any eye protection:    A. Building 2.  B. Building 3.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i): The end of a platform 10 feet or less in length, extended over its support more than 12 inches:    Building 3: The ends of the roof bracket scaffolds less than 10 feet in length and used by employees during the roofing activities extended approximately 24 inches over the supports, and the planks were not secured to prevent from displacement during use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end.  The ends of the roof bracket scaffolds greater 10 feet in length and used by employees during the roofing activities in the following locations extended over the supports more than 18 inches, and the planks were not secured to prevent from displacement during use:  A. Building 2: B. Building 3:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 L03

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(l)(3): Window jacks shall not be used to support planks placed between one window jack and another, or for other elements of scaffolding.  BUILDING 2: A window jack was used to support the center of a carpenter bracket scaffold used by employees during roofing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.      BUILDING 2: The employee, working from the carpenter bracket scaffold was not provided with a safe and proper means to access the roof from the carpenter bracket scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    Carpenter bracket and Roof Bracket scaffolds in the following locations and used by employees performing roofing activities were not inspected by a competent person to ensure they were safe to use:    A. Building 2:  B. Building 3:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 F04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4): Part(s) of a scaffold that were damaged or weakened, such that the scaffold's strength was less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section, were not immediately repaired, replaced, braced to meet those provisions, nor removed from service until repaired.  BUILDING 2: The damaged plank of the Werner Model 2320 scaffold, used by employees during roofing activities was not removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Building 2: The side rails of the 32-foot aluminum extension ladder, used by an employee to access a carpenter bracket scaffold did not extend at least 3-feet above the platform and no handhold or equivalent was provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:  Building 2: The employee, using the 32-foot aluminum extension ladder to manually carry several sheets of metal seam roofing onto the carpenter bracket scaffold was unable to maintain at least three points of contact with the ladder at all times.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:  Building 2: An employee was using the 32-foot aluminum extension ladder to manually carry bulky unsecured roofing materials onto the carpenter bracket scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    WORKSITE: The employees, using ladders to access the walking/working surfaces of scaffolds were not provided with information and training in the hazards associated with the types of ladders being used or the procedures necessary to eliminate or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 G01 VII

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $3,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    The employees, performing roofing activities from carpenter bracket and roof bracket scaffolds in the following locations were not protected from falling between 20 feet and 21 feet 10 inches to the ground by the use of personal fall arrest systems or equivalent fall protection systems.    A. Building 2:  B. Building 3:      IG Great Exteriors, LLC was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent Occupational Safety and Health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b) (13), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1056550, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1a, issued on 4/24/2015 and affirmed as a final order on 6/16/2016 with respect to a workplace located at 5 Hidden Hill, Westport, CT.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3520
  • — Z (R) $6160

1926.454 A

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  WORKSITE: The employees performing roofing activities from roof bracket and carpenter bracket scaffolds were not provided with training in the recognition of hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used or the procedures necessary to eliminate or minimize those hazards.     IG Great Exteriors, LLC was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent Occupational Safety and Health standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a) (1), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1056550, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1b, issued on 4/24/2015 and affirmed as a final order on 6/16/2016 with respect to a workplace located at 5 Hidden Hill, Westport, CT.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

View IG Great Exteriors, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341422061.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.