CHANDLER, AZ —
OSHA Inspection: ANIMAL NUTRITION SYSTEMS LP
Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of ANIMAL NUTRITION SYSTEMS LP in 6801 SUNDUST RD, CHANDLER, AZ 85226 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 341426153.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANIMAL NUTRITION SYSTEMS LP
- Site address
- 6801 SUNDUST RD
- City
- CHANDLER
- State
- AZ
- ZIP
- 85226
- Mailing
- 571 N. 54TH STREET, CHANDLER, AZ 85226
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311119
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent). a) Loading Dock: On or about April 05, 2016, standard railing (or equivalent) was not provided to prevent a fall and struck-by hazard. The height of the dock was 49-1/2 inches above ground level and a 25 inch space existed between the end of the dock and a dumpster.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) On or about April 05, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not assess the workplace for propane hazards. Employees remove the propane cylinder from the propane-fueled CAT forklift and fill the cylinder from the propane gas tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): a) On or about April 05, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not certify a workplace hazard assessment was performed for propane. Employees remove the propane cylinder from the propane-fueled CAT forklift and fill the cylinder from the propane gas tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) On or about April 05, 2016, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure eye protection was utilized when employees remove the propane cylinder from the propane-fueled CAT forklift and fill the cylinder from the propane gas tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) Production Area: On or about April 05, 2016, an employee with facial hair wore a filtering face piece dust mask while working with the supplemental dairy cow feed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1020
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- May 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. a) On or about April 05, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a Safety Data Sheet available for Propane. Propane was used to fill the propane cylinder and operate the CAT forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Animal Nutrition Systems LP
View Animal Nutrition Systems LP's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311119)
More inspections in AZ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341426153.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.