CLEVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: T & M MASONRY, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of T & M MASONRY, INC in 11623 CLIFTON BLVD, CLEVELAND, OH 44102 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341431773.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- T & M MASONRY, INC
- Site address
- 11623 CLIFTON BLVD
- City
- CLEVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44102
- Mailing
- 4164 BEAT RD., LITCHFIELD, OH 44253
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about 4/27/16 at a job site located at 11623 Clifton Blvd Cleveland, OH, during tuck point grinding, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. Employees were required to wear filtering face-piece respirators while cutting mortar.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: On or about 4/27/16, the employer did not effectively evaluate employee exposure to crystalline silica exposure while employees were required to cut mortar during tuckpointing operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about 4/27/16, during tuckpointing grinding activities, the employer did not ensure employees wearing tight-fitting respirators are fit tested prior to use of the respirator. Employees were required to wear respirators during cutting operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 4/27/16, the employer did not provide protective hard hats to employees walking in the area of the scaffolding, where employees were using hand tools above, at a height of 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person: On or about 3/1/2016, during commercial tuck pointing activities, the employer failed to initiate and maintain a program that provided for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about 4/27/16, during commercial tuckpointing activities, the employer failed to ensure that the working levels of the scaffolding were fully planked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports at a height greater than 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 E09 I
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(i): The employer shall provide safe means of access for each employee erecting or dismantling a scaffold where the provision of safe access is feasible and does not create a greater hazard. The employer shall have a competent person determine whether it is feasible or would pose a greater hazard to provide, and have employees use a safe means of access: On or about 3/1/2016, during commercial tuck pointing activities, the employer failed to ensure that a safe means of access was provided to access the scaffolding. The employee was using the end frame to access the working platform and was required to climb around the planking that was overhanging outside of the end frame.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in accordance with paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section: On or about 4/27/16, during commercial tuck pointing activities, the employer failed to ensure that the working levels of the scaffolding were had a guardrail system installed to prevent a fall to the concrete ground at a height greater than 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- May 3, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: On or about 3/1/2016, during commercial tuck pointing activities, the employer failed to ensure that a toeboard was erected along the outside edge of the platform of the scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at T & M Masonry, INC
View T & M Masonry, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341431773.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.