CAMP PENDLETON, CA —
OSHA Inspection: USMC CAMP PENDLETON - PROVOST MARSHALL OFFICE (PMO)
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of USMC CAMP PENDLETON - PROVOST MARSHALL OFFICE (PMO) in BLDG. 1523, 11TH STREET, CAMP PENDLETON, CA 92055 (NAICS 922120). OSHA activity number 341432425.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- USMC CAMP PENDLETON - PROVOST MARSHALL OFFICE (PMO)
- Site address
- BLDG. 1523, 11TH STREET
- City
- CAMP PENDLETON
- State
- CA
- ZIP
- 92055
- Mailing
- BLDG. 1523, 11TH STREET, CAMP PENDLETON, CA 92055
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 922120
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- D
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 III
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that a copy of the Exposure Control Plan was accessible to employees, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020(e): On or about April 27, 2016 the exposure control plan covering employees at the Provost Marshal Office was not available to employees for their review.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually, whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure, and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure. On or about April 27, 2016, the exposure control plan covering employees at the Provost Marshal Office was not reviewed or updated on an annual basis.. The last documented review and update was conducted in October of 2009.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D03 I
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(i): When there is occupational exposure, the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, appropriate personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns, laboratory coats, face shields or masks and eye protection, and mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices. On or about April 27, 2016, and at times there prior to, the employer did not provide employees who respond to emergency events where they may be exposed to bloodborne pathogens, with appropriate personal protective equipment at no cost. Employees had to replace latex free/ latex gloves at their own expense once the pair initially issued was contaminated or used. A ready supply of gloves was not available at the work place.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D03 III
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment in the appropriate sizes was readily accessible at the worksite or issued to employees: On or about April 27, 2016 the employer did not provide latex free/latex gloves in various sizes for employees to use during response to emergency incidents where they may be exposed to bloodborne pathogens or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D02 IV
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(iv): When provisions for hand washing facilities were not feasible, the employer did not provide either an appropriate antiseptic hand cleanser in conjunction with clean cloth/paper towels or antiseptic towelettes: On or about April 27, 2016, the employer did not provide an appropriate antiseptic hand cleanser and clean cloths/paper towels for when hand washing facilities were not immediately feasible. Employees routinely responded to emergencies where they could come into contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the required training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually. On or about April 27, 2016 the employer did not ensure that employees with occupational exposure were retrained within one year of their previous training on bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 922120)
More inspections in CA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341432425.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.