Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HUGO PEREZ in 5595 FOLSOM DRIVE, GROVEPORT, OH 43125 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341435543.

Watch Hugo Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HUGO PEREZ
Site address
5595 FOLSOM DRIVE
City
GROVEPORT
State
OH
ZIP
43125
Mailing
2621 RED ROCK BLVD APT A, GROVE CITY, OH 43123
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   a. In regards to citation 1, item 1, issued on May 5, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, May 17, 2016.  The violation read as follows:     29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities six feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:  a. Located at 5595 Folsom Drive in Groveport, Ohio: On or about April 27, 2016, employees were preforming roofing work on a two story residential house without the use of fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. Located at 5595 Folsom Drive in Groveport, Ohio: On or about April 27, 2016, employees were preforming roofing work on a two story residential house without the use of fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately twenty one feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View HUGO PEREZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341435543.