Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: GERALDO VIDAL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GERALDO VIDAL in 12750 WATER PEARL, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78253 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 341436210.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Geraldo Vidal for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Geraldo Vidal is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GERALDO VIDAL
Site address
12750 WATER PEARL
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78253
Mailing
6315 BROWNLEAF ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78227
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   On or about April 27, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet in height to unpaved ground level below while installing decking material on an a rooftop without wearing fall protection nor were there any other measures of fall protection in place.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.503 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees  who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate  understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section:  On the roof of a residential building, on or about April 27, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard 13 feet in height to the unpaved ground below, while not being trained on the procedures to recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) On the roof of a residential building, on or about April 27, 2015, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 11 feet in height to unpaved ground level below when using a portable ladder that was not 3 feet above the upper landing surface to gain access to a roof.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  On a residential building, on or about April 27, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 11 feet to the unpaved ground below, while using a ladder that was not 3 feet above the upper landing surface and not being trained on ladder hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341436210.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.