Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BROTHERS & SON ASBESTOS REMOVAL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BROTHERS & SON ASBESTOS REMOVAL, LLC in 2121 THOMASTON AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06704 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 341442358.

Watch Brothers & SON Asbestos Removal, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brothers & SON Asbestos Removal, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2121 THOMASTON AVE.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06704
Mailing
18 GEORGE STREET UNIT #1, EAST HARTFORD, CT
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all anchorage points that were used for attachment for personal fall arrest systems were capable of supporting at least 5000 pounds per empoyee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(ii): The complete personal fall arrest system did not limit the maximum arresting force on an employee to 1,800 pounds when used with a body harness.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the personal fall arrest system that was worn by an employee who was exposed to fall hazards would limit the maximum arresting force on the employee not more than 1,800 pounds.  On or about 04/21/2016, an employee, who was wearing a personal fall arrest system that did not limit the maximum arresting force to 1,800 pounds sustained serious injuries after free falling more than six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the personal fall arrest system that was worn by an employee who was exposed to fall hazards was rigged in such manner so that the employee would not have more than six (6) feet free fall to lower level.  On or about 04/21/2016, the personal fall arrest system that was worn by an employee was not rigged appropriately, and the employee sustained serious injuries from free falling more than six feet to lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while working from a height above six feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341442358.