COLUMBUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: COLUMBUS STEEL CASTINGS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COLUMBUS STEEL CASTINGS in 2211 PARSONS AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43207 (NAICS 332111). OSHA activity number 341452647.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLUMBUS STEEL CASTINGS
- Site address
- 2211 PARSONS AVENUE
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43207
- Mailing
- 2211 PARSONS AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332111
- Employees
- 400
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 20, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a. In regards to citation 1, item 1a, issued on August 24, 2016 the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, September 12, 2016. The violation read as follows: 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): "Lockout and Tagging." While any employee is exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which have been deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts shall be locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph. The requirements shall be followed in the order in which they are presented (i.e., paragraph (b)(2)(i) first, then paragraph (b)(2)(ii), etc.). Note 1: As used in this section, fixed equipment refers to equipment fastened in place or connected by permanent wiring methods. Note 2: Lockout and tagging procedures that comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of 1910.147 will also be deemed to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section provided that: [1] The procedures address the electrical safety hazards covered by this Subpart; and [2] The procedures also incorporate the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(D) and (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section: a. In department 01-pouring floor, employees were exposed to a 250 V electrical hazard when they disconnected a Winkle magnet from the 1400 crane. The employer failed to implement lockout and/or tag out during the disconnection of the magnet. As a result, the remaining applicable energy elements, involving dissipation of residual energy [1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(C)], and verification of deenergized condition [1910.333(b)(2)(iv)], were not implemented to protect employees from the electrical hazard. b. In regards to citation 1, item 1b, issued on August 24, 2016 the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, September 28, 2016. The violation read as follows: 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): "Procedures." The employer shall maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) and shall make it available for inspection by employees and by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives. Note: The written procedures may be in the form of a copy of paragraph (b) of this section: a. In department 01-pouring floor, the employer did not have written procedure for disconnecting the Winkle magnet from the 1400 crane.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $1000
1910.333 B02
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $12,471
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): "Lockout and Tagging." While any employee is exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which have been deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts shall be locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph. The requirements shall be followed in the order in which they are presented (i.e., paragraph (b)(2)(i) first, then paragraph (b)(2)(ii), etc.). Note 1: As used in this section, fixed equipment refers to equipment fastened in place or connected by permanent wiring methods. Note 2: Lockout and tagging procedures that comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of 1910.147 will also be deemed to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section provided that: [1] The procedures address the electrical safety hazards covered by this Subpart; and [2] The procedures also incorporate the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(D) and (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. a. In department 01-pouring floor, employees were exposed to a 250 V electrical hazard when they disconnected a Winkle magnet from the 1400 crane. The employer failed to implement lockout and/or tag out during the disconnection of the magnet. As a result, the remaining applicable energy elements, involving dissipation of residual energy [1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(C)], and verification of deenergized condition [1910.333(b)(2)(iv)], were not implemented to protect employees from the electrical hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $12471
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): "Procedures." The employer shall maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) and shall make it available for inspection by employees and by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives. Note: The written procedures may be in the form of a copy of paragraph (b) of this section. a. In department 01-pouring floor, the employer did not have written procedure for disconnecting the Winkle magnet from the 1400 crane.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Columbus Steel Castings
View Columbus Steel Castings's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332111)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341452647.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.