Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: HALLIBURTON

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HALLIBURTON in RIG #381, 22.1 MILES NORTHWEST OF PECOS, TX, PECOS, TX 79772 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 341453884.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Halliburton for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Halliburton is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HALLIBURTON
Site address
RIG #381, 22.1 MILES NORTHWEST OF PECOS, TX
City
PECOS
State
TX
ZIP
79772
Mailing
6155 W MURPHY, ODESSA, TX 79763
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
300
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Jan 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,811 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, An employee was mixing chemicals without wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). The employee was exposed to eye, face and skin injuries.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $3500
  • · C (S) $4811
  • · Z (S) $4811

1910.132 F03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(3)(iii): The employer did not retrain employees when inadequacies in the affected employee's use of PPE indicated the employee had not retained the requisite understanding:  On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, an employee was mixing chemicals without using the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). The employee seemed to not understand the seriousness of not wearing PPE. This behavior exposed the employee to eye, face and skin injuries.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.304 G05

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,811 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, an employee was working inside a trailer that was not grounded. The employee was exposed to electric shock and/or burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $4811
  • · Z (S) $4811

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Jan 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,811 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:    On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, an employee was working in a trailer which had two outlets that had broken faceplate covers. This exposed the employee to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $500
  • · C (S) $4811
  • · Z (S) $4811

1910.305 G01 IV C

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(C): Flexible cords and cables were used where run through doorways, windows, or similar openings:  On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, an employee was working in a trailer that had a 120V electrical cord running through a window of the trailer's door. The employee was exposed to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 J02 VII

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(vii): A receptacle installed in a wet location where the product intended to be plugged into it was to be attended while in use (for example, portable tools) did not have an enclosure that was weatherproof when the attachment plug cap was removed:  On or about May 03, 2016 and at times prior thereto, an employee was working in a trailer that had an exterior outlet that was missing a weatherproof enclosure. This exposed the employee to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Halliburton's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341453884.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.