LEOLA, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA in 60 EAST MAIN STREET, LEOLA, PA 17540 (NAICS 326140). OSHA activity number 341455301.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA
- Site address
- 60 EAST MAIN STREET
- City
- LEOLA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17540
- Mailing
- 60 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 546, LEOLA, PA 17540
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326140
- Employees
- 1750
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 E03 V
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,908 · Current $11,135
19902280K105
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v): The process hazard analysis did not address the hazards related to facility siting: INSTANCES (a) and (b) deleted per ISA a) For the Styrene Polymerization and Pentane Impregnation Processes - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer failed to address the hazards of an isobutane overpressure on the styrene polymerization and pentane impregnation processes, which were 1500 feet from the isobutane foam sheet extrusion process, and their ability to withstand an explosion overpressure in the 2015 Process Hazard Analysis. b) For the Styrene Polymerization and Pentane Impregnation Processes - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer failed to address the hazards of a pressure vessel overpressure on the isobutane foam sheet extrusion process, which was 1500 feet from the styrene polymerization and pentane impregnation processes, and its ability to withstand an explosion overpressure in the 2015 Process Hazard Analysis. c) For Fabrication Building 7 - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer failed to address the hazards of a pressure vessel overpressure on Fabrication Building 7, which was within 200 feet of the styrene polymerization and pentane impregnation processes, and its ability to withstand an explosion overpressure in the 2015 Process Hazard Analysis. d) For the Styrene Polymerization and Pentane Impregnation Processes - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer failed to address the hazards of a runaway styrene polymerization reactor overpressure on the North Cup Production Building 1, PCC Building 3, Lid Building 4, Switchgear Building 16, and Injection Molding Building 12, which were within 400 feet of the styrene polymerization and pentane impregnation processes, and their ability to withstand an explosion overpressure in the 2015 Process Hazard Analysis. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $11135
- · Z (S) $8908
1910.119 E03 VII
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $8,908 · Current $0 Reduced
19902280K105
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vii): The process hazard analysis did not address a qualitative evaluation of a range of the possible safety and health effects of failure of controls on employees in the workplace: a) For the Styrene Polymerization and Pentane Impregnation Processes - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer did not to include the likely number and type of probable injuries and illnesses to employees that could result from the failure of controls, the consequences of a process deviation, or the chemical exposures in the 2015 Process Hazard Analysis. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $8908
1910.119 M04
- Issued
- Oct 19, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $8,908 · Current $8,908
19902280K105
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(m)(4): A written incident report was not prepared at the conclusion of the investigation that included at a minimum: the date of the incident; date the investigation began; a description of the incident; the factors that resulted from the investigation; any recommendations resulting from the investigation; and the recommendation's resolutions: a) For the Styrene Polymerization and Pentane Impregnation Processes - On or about October 17, 2016, the employer's process incident investigation conclusion reports did not consistently include an analysis of the factors that contributed to the incident or any recommendations resulting from the investigation, and a method for the timely documentation and resolution of those recommendations. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8908
- · Z (S) $8908
More inspections at Dart Container Corporation of Pennsylvania
View Dart Container Corporation of Pennsylvania's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326140)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341455301.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.