Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: SC MANUFACTURING TEXAS, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SC MANUFACTURING TEXAS, LLC. in 6401 COUNTY ROAD 912, JOSHUA, TX 76058 (NAICS 333515). OSHA activity number 341456721.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SC Manufacturing Texas, LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SC Manufacturing Texas, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6401 COUNTY ROAD 912
City
JOSHUA
State
TX
ZIP
76058
Mailing
6401 COUNTY ROAD 912, JOSHUA, TX 76058
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333515
Employees
26
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedure:      (a) In the manufacturing facility, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear respirators to perform sandblasting operations.    (b) In the manufacturing facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    In the manufacturing facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,925 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks;                                                                                                                 a)    In the manufacturing area, employees operated a Bridgeport drill press model and s/n not legible with no guard over rotating parts exposed to amputation hazards.      b)    In the manufacturing area, employees were operating a Baldor Grinder s/n W4-89 with no guards in the metal fabricating area exposed to amputation hazards.      c)     In the manufacturing area, employees operated a Birmingham drill press with no guard over rotating parts, s/n not legible exposed to amputation hazards.       d)    In the manufacturing area, employees were operating Dayton grinders model #s 2LKR9, s/n not legible with no guards exposed to amputation hazards.      e)    In the manufacturing area, employees were operating Ryobi 8 bench grinder model # BGH827 S/N not legible with no guards exposed to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1925
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):  Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted  closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:          a)  In the manufacturing area, employees operating the Baldor grinder 8 diameter wheel S/N W4-89 with 115 volts-3600 RPM that did not have the work rest on the left wheel exposing employees to struck by hazards.          b)  In the manufacturing area, employees were operating two Dayton Grinders model #s 2LKR9, s/n not legible with 120/240 volts-3450 RPM had no work rest exposing employees to struck by hazards.          c)   In the manufacturing area, employees were operating Ryobi bench grinder model # BGH827 S/N not legible had no work rest exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910. 1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each work place, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning:          In the manufacturing area, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was available at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

View SC Manufacturing Texas, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341456721.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.