Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: JETRO HOLDINGS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JETRO HOLDINGS, LLC in 45 EAST WESLEY STREET, SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606 (NAICS 424410). OSHA activity number 341457117.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jetro Holdings, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jetro Holdings, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JETRO HOLDINGS, LLC
Site address
45 EAST WESLEY STREET
City
SOUTH HACKENSACK
State
NJ
ZIP
07606
Mailing
45 EAST WESLEY STREET, SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424410
Employees
143
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.305 A02 X

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(x): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from accidental damage, as might be caused, for example, by sharp corners, projections, and doorways or other pinch points:  a) Meat Department: An extension cord used to service a portable scale was placed underneath the door, on or about, 5/9/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  a) Meat Department: A flexible extension cord used to service a portable scale was missing a ground pin, on or about, 5/9/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.37 A03

Repeat Gravity 1 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $16,500 · Current $9,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  a) Receiving Department: The emergency egress route leading to an emergency exit was blocked by pallets, on or about, 5/9/16.  b) Deli Salad Area: The emergency egress route leading to an emergency exit was blocked by a 6 feet storage rack, on or about, 5/9/16.  c) Front Area of Store: The emergency egress route leading to an emergency exit was blocked by a cart, on or about, 5/9/16.  d) Meat Department: The emergency egress route leading to an emergency exit was blocked by a cart, on or about, 5/9/16.  Restaurant Depot was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.37(a)(3), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 995432, citation number 1, item number 2B and was affirmed as a final order on 10/16/14, with respect to a workplace located at, 1050 Thomas Busch Memorial Hwy. Pennsauken, NJ.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $9900
  • · Z (R) $16500

1910.37 B04

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $16,500 · Current $9,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:  Meat Department Aisleway: The path leading to an emergency exit was not apparent. The employer did not post signage indicating the direction of travel to the exit, on or about, 5/9/16.  Restaurant Depot was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.37(b)(4), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 995432, citation number 1, item number 2C and was affirmed as a final order on 10/16/14, with respect to a workplace located at, 1050Thomas Busch Memorial Hwy. Pennsauken, NJ.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (R) $9900
  • · Z (R) $16500

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  Or in the alternative,  29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.  a) System Manager's Office: A container of glass plus cleaner used to clean conveyor belts, was not labeled with the identity of the hazardous chemical, on or about, 5/9/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  Or in the alternative:  29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.  a) System Manager's Office: A container of glass plus cleaner used to clean conveyor belts, was not labeled with the appropriate hazards associated with the chemical, on or about, 5/9/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Jetro Holdings, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341457117.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.