Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RUFINO CHINCHILLA TOBAR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUFINO CHINCHILLA TOBAR in #1 ASPE, CANYON, TX 79016 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341458974.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rufino Chinchilla Tobar — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rufino Chinchilla Tobar is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
#1 ASPE
City
CANYON
State
TX
ZIP
79016
Mailing
3308 S. EDDY #133, AMARILLO, TX 79109
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.    Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while using an electric circular saw without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1020

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).    Employees engaged in residential roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.    Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to fall hazards, in excess of nine feet, while using a ladder that was not extended at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $2040

1926.1053 B20

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2016
Abate by
Jun 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder.    Employees engaged in roofing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of ten feet as they incorrectly descended the ladder from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2400

View Rufino Chinchilla Tobar's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341458974.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.