Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BILL GINGERICH CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BILL GINGERICH CONSTRUCTION in 151 BRIGHTON LANE, PENINSULA, OH 44264 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 341463966.

Watch Bill Gingerich Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bill Gingerich Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
151 BRIGHTON LANE
City
PENINSULA
State
OH
ZIP
44264
Mailing
16900 MADISON ROAD, MIDDLEFIELD, OH 44062
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  On or about July 18, 2016, the employer failed to submit abatement for any of the 5 (five) serious citations (with instances) which were issued on May 23, 2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that a job site safety analysis was performed to determine what potential hazards  exist and if any personal protective equipment may be necessary for the protection of the employees working at the site.  Employee's were exposed to struck by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected from struck by hazards when using a powered nail gun.  The employer does not provide or require the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected from a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet 9 inches by utilizing a personal fall arrest system (pfas) or having other fall protection devices or systems in place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that employees were trained in hazard awareness relating to falls from heights.  The residential structure was approximately 10 feet 9 inches in height.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that a yellow aluminum ladder, which was being used to access an upper landing surface of a residential construction project, was extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.  The approximate height of the upper landing surface was 10 feet 9 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:  On or about May 9, 2016, during the installation of a residential home framing and assembly project located at 151 Brighton Lane, Peninsula OH, the employer failed to ensure that the yellow aluminum ladder was used on a stable and even surface or to ensure that the "feet" were being used to add additional stability.  The ground surface was made up of uneven dirt, large stones and rocks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341463966.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.