OSHA Inspection: BOTTLE SOLUTIONS

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about May 11, 2016, the employer had not documented that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  On or about May 11, 2016, the employer did not provide training on personal protective equipment to employees exposed to hazardous inks and solvents.

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  On or about May 11, 2016, employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to LS ST Solvent 70/30, Blue SH Red Monocat NL, Primrose Yellow Monocat , Opaque White Monocat, Blending Black Monocat , and ET -12 Retarder without being provided with a safety goggles and/or a face shield.

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about May 11, 2016, the employer failed to develop or implement a written hazard communication program at the facility. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to  LS ST Solvent 70/30, Blue SH Red Monocat NL, Primrose Yellow Monocat , Opaque White Monocat, Blending Black Monocat , and ET -12 Retarder.

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about May 11, 2016, the employer failed to train employees on the safe use and handling of hazardous chemicals used in the workplace. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to LS ST Solvent 70/30, Blue SH Red Monocat NL, Primrose Yellow Monocat , Opaque White Monocat, Blending Black Monocat , and ET -12 Retarder .

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Abate by

Jul 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $700 · Current $490 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.  Abatement Certification and Documentation is required  a) On or about May 11, 2016, the employer did not keep a log for each recordable work related injury/illness for the calendar year 2016 in accordance with the record keeping requirements.

Issued

Jun 30, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about May 11, 2016, the employer did not have ABC fire extinguishers located throughout the facility visually inspected monthly.