Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AIRFLOW SYSTEMS INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AIRFLOW SYSTEMS INC. in 11221 PAGEMILL ROAD, DALLAS, TX 75243 (NAICS 333413). OSHA activity number 341468635.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Airflow Systems INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Airflow Systems INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11221 PAGEMILL ROAD
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75243
Mailing
11221 PAGEMILL ROAD, DALLAS, TX 75243
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333413
Employees
45
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Abate by
Sep 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $0 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees:    In the storage area of the facility where employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard from a storage rack system:        a) The storage rack system not having plaques containing the maximum permissible unit load and/or maximum uniformly distributed load per level, and/or the racking system did not have the maximum total load per bay;  b) The storage rack system was not anchored to the ground;  c) Storage rack support members were damaged.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $8730

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Abate by
Sep 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $3,990 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    (a) In the Airflow Systems Inc. facility where seven (7) employees who operated powered industrial trucks were not provided refresher training at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3990
  • · Z (S) $8730

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Abate by
Sep 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $3,990 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (a) In the Airflow Systems Inc. facility where one quality control employee used compressed air at  approximately 100 p.s.i. to clean equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3990
  • · Z (S) $8730

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341468635.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.